Not signed in (Sign In)
Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    •  
      CommentAuthorXCloud
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    How the heck are you supposed to get a donk out of a hand?? Especially when you're betting nearly 1/3 of your own stack every bet?

    Full Tilt Poker Game #3965301215: $2 + $0.25 Sit & Go (30158935), Table 1 - 25/50 - No Limit Hold'em - 18:14:59 ET - 2007/10/25

    Seat 1: Nomad02 (845)

    Seat 2: Fedor Emilianko (895)

    Seat 4: Rockets79 (2,275)

    Seat 5: chenman4ev (3,195)

    Seat 6: Cdub369 (1,320)

    Seat 7: SV AcuDoc (1,730)

    Seat 8: XCloud (1,450)

    Seat 9: turboslash (1,790)

    chenman4ev posts the small blind of 25

    Cdub369 posts the big blind of 50

    The button is in seat #4

    *** HOLE CARDS ***

    Dealt to XCloud [Ad Jh]

    SV AcuDoc folds

    XCloud raises to 250

    turboslash folds

    Nomad02 folds

    Fedor Emilianko folds

    Rockets79 calls 250

    chenman4ev folds

    Cdub369 calls 200

    *** FLOP *** [Kh 5s 9d]

    turboslash is sitting out

    Cdub369 checks

    XCloud bets 200

    Rockets79 calls 200

    Cdub369 folds

    *** TURN *** [Kh 5s 9d] [Ts]

    XCloud has 15 seconds left to act

    XCloud bets 400

    Rockets79 calls 400

    *** RIVER *** [Kh 5s 9d Ts] [Js]

    XCloud bets 600, and is all in

    turboslash has returned

    Rockets79 has 15 seconds left to act

    Rockets79 calls 600

    turboslash is sitting out

    *** SHOW DOWN ***

    XCloud shows [Ad Jh] a pair of Jacks

    turboslash has returned

    Rockets79 shows [Qc Ah] a straight, Ace high

    Rockets79 wins the pot (3,175) with a straight, Ace high

    XCloud stands up

    *** SUMMARY ***

    Total pot 3,175 | Rake 0

    Board: [Kh 5s 9d Ts Js]

    Seat 1: Nomad02 didn't bet (folded)

    Seat 2: Fedor Emilianko didn't bet (folded)

    Seat 4: Rockets79 (button) showed [Qc Ah] and won (3,175) with a straight, Ace high

    Seat 5: chenman4ev (small blind) folded before the Flop

    Seat 6: Cdub369 (big blind) folded on the Flop

    Seat 7: SV AcuDoc didn't bet (folded)

    Seat 8: XCloud showed [Ad Jh] and lost with a pair of Jacks

    Seat 9: turboslash didn't bet (folded)

    •  
      CommentAuthorPastorVor
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    I wanna try my hand at this analysis game. I'm very much a novice and really just want to see what you think of how I saw this... (to help my game)... please don't beat me up!

    First off, I see a different scenario than most of you do. I see someone calling down an ace after he decides he's got the better of it at the flop. I don't think alot of thought went into it, just something along the lines of...

    "I've got AQ and I think I'm winning at the flop."

    Full Tilt Poker Game #3965301215: $2 + $0.25 Sit & Go (30158935), Table 1 - 25/50 - No Limit Hold'em - 18:14:59 ET - 2007/10/25

    Seat 1: Nomad02 (845)

    Seat 2: Fedor Emilianko (895)

    Seat 4: Rockets79 (2,275) <----- he's second high at the table.

    Seat 5: chenman4ev (3,195)

    Seat 6: Cdub369 (1,320)

    Seat 7: SV AcuDoc (1,730)

    Seat 8: XCloud (1,450)

    Seat 9: turboslash (1,790)

    chenman4ev posts the small blind of 25

    Cdub369 posts the big blind of 50

    The button is in seat #4

    *** HOLE CARDS ***

    Dealt to XCloud [Ad Jh]

    SV AcuDoc folds

    XCloud raises to 250

    turboslash folds

    Nomad02 folds

    Fedor Emilianko folds

    Rockets79 calls 250 <---- he's not reading you, merely calling with a good hand. He probably could have raised to see how good your hand was but he didn't so he's either trying to slow play or more likely just lazily hitting the call button with a good hand. I know MANY players who play "just to see the flop".

    chenman4ev folds

    Cdub369 calls 200

    *** FLOP *** [Kh 5s 9d]

    turboslash is sitting out

    Cdub369 checks

    XCloud bets 200

    Rockets79 calls 200 <----- here, he's decided that his AQ is good. You don't have a K and his hand, in his mind is a winner. At least, good enough to call it off. I'm guessing not a lot of thought went into it, he just "felt" it was worth calling at this point. Remember, this is still only a total of 450 out of his second best chip count. He probably calls just about any bet short of "All in".

    Cdub369 folds

    *** TURN *** [Kh 5s 9d] [Ts]

    XCloud has 15 seconds left to act

    XCloud bets 400

    Rockets79 calls 400 <----- he has already decided that he has won and the T doesn't change his mind in the least. He assumes you don't have a pair, and to him his A is good. His total commitment is 850 from 2275.

    He is showing 1825 in his stack, 400 at this point is nothing compared to the pot of 1475 (did I add that up right?) Anyway, at this point it doesn't matter to him if you made your hand or not. It's too cheap not to call and he's already convinced himself that he's going to win. I'm going to guess that he called these bets quickly.

    *** RIVER *** [Kh 5s 9d Ts] [Js]

    XCloud bets 600, and is all in

    turboslash has returned

    Rockets79 has 15 seconds left to act

    Rockets79 calls 600 <---- he woke up with a straight, whatdaya know? In his mind he has made the greatest play of all night. He lazily called off his Ace and donked himself a straight. No way he's not calling. I wouldn't be surprised if he called WITHOUT making the straight.

    turboslash is sitting out

    *** SHOW DOWN ***

    XCloud shows [Ad Jh] a pair of Jacks

    turboslash has returned

    Rockets79 shows [Qc Ah] a straight, Ace high

    Rockets79 wins the pot (3,175) with a straight, Ace high

    XCloud stands up

    *** SUMMARY ***

    Total pot 3,175 | Rake 0

    Board: [Kh 5s 9d Ts Js]

    Seat 1: Nomad02 didn't bet (folded)

    Seat 2: Fedor Emilianko didn't bet (folded)

    Seat 4: Rockets79 (button) showed [Qc Ah] and won (3,175) with a straight, Ace high

    Seat 5: chenman4ev (small blind) folded before the Flop

    Seat 6: Cdub369 (big blind) folded on the Flop

    Seat 7: SV AcuDoc didn't bet (folded)

    Seat 8: XCloud showed [Ad Jh] and lost with a pair of Jacks

    Seat 9: turboslash didn't bet (folded)

    Bottom line: At this level you are going to find players who are not analyzing each and every hand and are only playing their own hands. They see their hand as "good" so they play it. The bet amounts were not enough to force him to stop and think about things. Maybe they were the "right" size based on the blinds and such, but other factors are at play. Sometimes you have to bet more in order to get someone off of a hand and other times it doesn't matter what you bet they aren't gonna fold no matter what.

    If it were me, and keeping in mind that this is a low level table, price almost not mattering at all the 250 pre-flop bet is good, but the flop bet was way too low. Either check it or bet it strong. If you check there, he's checking. If he bets you fold and you go on to the next hand. If he checks then you are still both clueless to what the other guy has and you might have a better chance of making a pot sized bet on the turn to make him think you actually DID hit that K. If you bet strong he may fold, thinking you hit that K... but strong is relative. It has to take into consideration his chipstack and his play style. Pot sized is good, but still might not be enough. At this point it may be all in or nothing.

  1. 728x890_us
    •  
      CommentAuthorHuJwang
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    Your problem is not necessarily picking the wrong spot to bluff but the wrong PERSON to bluff. Also, you sized it horribly. I almost can't blame him for calling a 200 chip bet into a like 750 chip pot or whatever.

    But most importantly you need to first figure out who you can bluff. You should be able to tell who are the fish and who are the tight players before you try bluffing them. At a $2 game, most players are TERRIBLE and you just can't get them to fold. Their looseness may be partly justified - many of the players at that stakes are far too aggressive, and they probably do pick off a decent number of bluffs. Point is, you just can't expect the majority of the players to be bluffable at these stakes.

    In fact you should really be glad they aren't mostly bluffable - this makes them much easier to beat.

  2.  

    Stop bluffing so much.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerAA
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    Yeah, that's why I made the post right before this one by you... Still very tough and probably bad decision to call there for realizing XCloud's bluffing.. The way he bet in this hand just really seems like it'd be a bluff, but probably best to fold because like you said, there still isn't much he could beat.

    For some reason, it just seems like such an obvious bluff to me which is why I said that I'd need to see a situation where it wasn't a bluff, first.

    That guy probably did play it just for the draw which is a terrible play.

    Just a terribly played hand.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerAA
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    Seeing it makes my decision that it's a easy call much easier, though..

    Even though it looks like a bad play by XCloud, it is tough to actually make those calls.. You have to be sure of it, but this is why you should've bet more on flop and turn.. makes it more expensive for him no matter what his reason was for calling the hand down.

    If he realized the bad bets from the beginning and that's why he decided to call it down, then it was basically a good play. (I could just be saying this because it worked out, though, lol)

    I'd have to see another similar situation where it didn't work out to be sure.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerAA
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    Yea, +9999999999999999999999999

    And the guy probably was just a fish and the only way to know would be to ask him.

    If he answers saying, "But I was on a runner runner straight draw" or something.. = FISH

  3.  

    After thinking about it and reading some other's posts, here are my conclusions:

    1.) Cloud, I don't mind the idea of bluffing there, but the amounts need to be higher to represent a big hand.

    2.) I don't believe his opponent was that good to call with A-Q. I think he's just another player who can't get away from a hand like A-K, A-Q, or A-J.

    3.) What draw is he going for on the flop? He only has backdoor draws, and really has no reason to call. He picks up a weak draw on the turn. Still makes no sense to me. Again, unless he has an incredible read (which I doubt), I'm still not fond of his opponent's play.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerAA
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    And you need some help on betting with an aggressive style.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerJessO
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    Really? Isn't it possible that his opponent saw him make similar bets with nothing?

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerAA
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    Oh, I see..

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerAA
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    Yea, this is what I first thought.. Those very weak bets just say that he's bluffing or has a weak hand. A good thing to do would to raise on either the flop or turn because there's not much hands that the AQ can beat, so his weak bets could easily mean that he has a hand, but not a very good one.. But then you can also just call like his opponent did because if he does just have a really weak hand, you have an A, Q, or J that could probably help you win the pot and to call is just a weak 200 bet and then a weak 400 bet for 600 total.

    The 200 flop bet was just so weak and if you just call it might get you in trouble later on in the hand because he can catch something and suck out and it is just hard to make a decision to fold, call, or raise on the turn. (if you do have him beat).

    Way opponent should've played the hand IMO:

    I've made up my mind and think a fold or raise on the flop would be the best thing to do, a nice raise being better because you can win the pot right there (which would seem likely after seeing a weak 200 bet).

    If calling pre-flop (which, after thinking it over, I REALLY don't think your opponent should've done), then call on the turn after seeing yet another weak bet.. Idk here though, a fold would then possibly be best since you will probably have to call on the river again, too.

    (Now a raise probably wouldn't mean much)

    Again, though, he might have not thought about the weak bets and just called the flop and turn because he's a fish..

    •  
      CommentAuthorXCloud
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    ...Kind of like making other's think that I'm playing super conservative, then pop out some bluffs so that they'll think I only bet when I have something, or making them believe I'm super aggressive, then have them call, when I'm really just setting a trap for them.

  4.  

    So, calling down with A-Q high and no draws on the flop or an inside straight draw on the turn is good play? Please let me know how that is. If blinds are at 25-50, I'm doubting he has that much of a read.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerAA
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    XCloud played the hand scared and very weak.. That's what I would see in a 250 pre-flop raise and small flop bet/pretty small turn bet.... That shows a bad try at a bluff, IMO..

    It depends on what his opponent thought while playing the hand. If he saw that this was a weak play which it really seems like, then it was a good play. If he didn't take this into consideration and instead just played for the fact of trying to hit his draw, thinking he was behind, then very bad play.

    At the $2 level, the second one might be it, though... It just depends on his opponent to know if it was a smart play or a stupid play.

    •  
      CommentAuthorcraigo6x
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    Guess what people, sometimes all you need is Ace high, and it's not donkish to call with it. It always depends on your read, your position and the board texture.

    At the forum table the other night I called with AJ in position. The flop came 10 high rainbow, and I called a weak bet with my two overcards. the turn was an inocuous card, and my opponent checked. I checked behind. The river paired the board, and my opponent fired away.

    My assessment was he missed everything. His check on the turn told me he had nothing worth protecting. The 9 on the river didn't help and I instacalled.

    My AJ bet his 68.

  5.  

    You still need to play smart. Just try to pick your spots better, and don't feel the need to C-bet every raise. If you're being bullied around, then bet or raise when you get a pair on the flop. Just be willing to take a chance when you have a hand against an aggressive player.

  6.  

    Umm, in case you didn't read the HH, XCloud bet the whole way. I'm sorry but I'm still not giving his opponent credit for a read. I don't see many people at the $2 level with that good of a read. But as I mentioned earlier, his opponent needs to raise or fold pre-flop. The difference between this and Craig was that Cloud bet every street. The check on the turn for Craig confirmed his suspicion that his hand was best. Cloud bet the turn, trying to convice his opponent that he had a hand. The only problem was the bet amounts, but besides that, I don't see how Cloud played it bad.

    •  
      CommentAuthorFOUR ASES
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    I think you should go back to playing a rock insted of trying to bluff your way around. I think you need to play the game more to see how others play first before trying to bluff.

    Your raise after the flop should have been higher than the under bet of 200. Maybe if you bet the pot or higher he might have folded. You played to aggressive at the start of the game and just lost to fast. You made him pot committed, so both of you played the hand wrong.

    Go back to being a rock and build up your chip pile before trying to bluff. That way if you make another mistake, your still in the game.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerJessO
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    They are both reasonable calls, considering your weak bets. Both your bets were less than 1/2 pot. How do you expect to chase them away with that? You did nothing to show real strength, and gave him no reason to believe that you actually had a hand.

    Now let me ask you this: he called your bet on the flop and the turn. What kind of a hand did you put him on? You kept betting weak and he kept calling like he had a hand. Why did you keep making these weak bets when you had nothing, and he could've had damn near anything?

    A word of advice, something I've learned long ago: when you're playing low level tourneys, don't make these bluffs designed to look like you have a hand and your bet is screaming 'call me'. You will get called almost every time.

  7.  

    As a person who used to play $2 SNG's like this I can empathize. I can also offer some tips on how to deal with this.

    Tip #1: At the $2 table people will call with ANYTHING. And I do mean ANYTHING. Once I started understanding that fact I adjusted my game accordingly. Ace-high is good enough for some of these donkeys to call because they see lots of people bluffing with a lesser hand (as this guy did here).

    Tip #2: Once you understand tip #1, STOP BLUFFING. Just quit bluffing with nothing. All it does is build a pot in these players' eyes and give them MORE reason to call, not less. I wouldn't play this way but we are talking $2 players here who are likely playing not to win money but to be entertained.

    Tip #3: Start playing your position more effectively. You really need to size up on each hand you enter where you stand on position. In the hand noted here that player didn't have position on the donkey. You want position on calling stations, and you want real hands and flops when you get it. Since they will call with ANYTHING, your made hands will be paid off handsomely.

    Once you understand these, you will quit pushing with non-made hands and go a long way toward donkey proofing yourself. Remember, you can't bluff a donkey, but if you bet aggressively with strong hands they WILL pay you off.

    As a result of understanding these concepts, I now play $10 sng's.

  8.  

    I still lean towards this guy being a fish. The opponent's call on the flop is the worst play there. He either needs to raise or fold, but call is awful.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerAA
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    •  
      CommentAuthorXCloud
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    Wow, what a bunch of fishes here. Some of you guys are telling me you should keep calling big chunks of your stack out to chase cards. I was playing it off like I had something, knowing I had nothing. He kept calling, knowing he had nothing.

    •  
      CommentAuthorFOUR ASES
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    Don't you just love it when someone just keeps betting a Dead Ace ???

    •  
      CommentAuthornilgiri
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    Does it matter who played the worst? He played losing poker.

    Worse, he can't see it, nor does he listen to people when they tell him.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerJessO
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    How do you know that Rockets wasn't reading him? The OP never even stated his playing style.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerJessO
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    Actually, I don't think calling there is such a bad play, if you're calling with the intent of making a play on the turn. If you call here and your opponent checks or makes another weak raise on the turn, it's a good spot to push. Instead he just called the turn. If you don't think your opponent has a king (which his bets don't really indicate he does), a call is also reasonable since you have 10 outs, if you even need any.

    Although I agree the opponents' play was far from the best, I don't see it as 'donk' play either.

    •  
      CommentAuthorHuJwang
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    +1000000000000000000000

    •  
      CommentAuthorXCloud
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    Are you saying I do not know how to play poker or just that I don't listen to them?

    I admit it was a very foolish play on my part, but is being "pot committed" an excuse enough to keep calling? What would you have done, had you been in the other guy's position? Quote Obi-Wan, "Who's more foolish? The fool? Or the fool who follows him?"

    •  
      CommentAuthorcubbies760
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2007
     

    This is dead on. I used to push my c-bets, and them push them again...and again....and then realized that I may want to keep the pots fairly small until I feel that it can be mine.

    What are you trying to accomplish by making it 250 PF? Trying to steal the 75 in blinds? Probably not. You want some action with that AJ powerhouse.... .

    You got 3-way action, and decided to push and push until there wasn't anything left.

    Next time you may want to make the PF raise small enough that you can get away from the hand after a 1/2 pot c-bet. By juicing the pot up to 775 chips before the flop, alot of people at this level are gonna look at all of those chips out there and chase just because there's alot in the pot, just like you kept pushing because you wanted that large pot so badly.

    Welcome to the $2 SNGs.

  9.  

    Raising 5xBB PF screams "I am a Donk".

    Your continuation bet was weak.

    After such a weak CB bet I would probably have popped you with AQ.

  10.  

    Reading Star's post makes me wonder sometimes.. I do believe that his bets screamed weak but calling down with AQ minus the river was horrible.

    Cloud, the 1 thing i think you can take from this is that when you show weakness at this level, they will call you with A high 95% of the time praying they hit there A somewhere during the hand. If you hit trips, value betting at these levels is a great tool to disguise your hand.

    And if you really want to bluff in the future, make sure your bets dont look so weak. Once you show strength, most likely they will fold with A high.

    •  
      CommentAuthordcdoorknob
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2007
     

    You both played the hand really really bad. If it makes you feel better to focus on his bad play than your own, go right ahead. Although you don't have much hope of becoming a better player that way.

    •  
      CommentAuthornilgiri
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2007
     

    Instead of insulting people who actually know how to play poker, perhaps you should listen to them, since you clearly do not.

    I'm almost half thinking you are a troll making a joke...

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerAA
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2007
     

    Probably best way to answer.. Short, simple, and basically 100% true.

    I still think that the other guy could've played it very well because of above reasons that I made, but it's still tough to make the call for that better reason... And if it was a call just for the draw, then just terrible by both, not sure which is worse, just both terrible.

    •  
      CommentAuthorIABoomer
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2007
     

    You need to click the fold button. Otherwise, you'll still be in the hand.

    •  
      CommentAuthorstar24
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2007
     

    wow that a horrible move on your part dude, just be glad this was only a $2 s n g. if i were u i would go to a barnes n nobles, read a book and not play any real money till u know how play hold em...dont bluff like that jeez u both were chasing for nothing, and u got what u deserved u should actually pull all your money out of full tilt and go to a beginner poker place like Party Poker or something where they teach you to play, i love to play people like you thats how i get alot of money real quick on s n g and ring games cuz u people are just calling stations, but plz for ur sake read a book or learn in someway or pull your money out before u go broke on hands like this

  11.  

    And I was getting bashed on here for saying the opponent's play was the worst one here. Take that!!!

  12.  

    I didn't see the bets post-flop the first time, but that being said, please justify his opponent's calling with A-Q there. Even if his opponent put him on any type of pair (pockets or on flop) there is no reason for him to call here. The only way he calls is if he knows for sure Cloud has a weaker ace. A bet to 250 does not always indicate A-K, A-J, A-10, or any A-x. This could easily be a pair. I still do not like his opponent's play at any point except the river here. If you want to criticize clouds's play here, that's fine. It certainly wasn't the best, but again, Cloud is the one leading out here, and his opponent is the one calling down with nothing. Am I missing something? I'll stick by my stance that his opponent's play was much much worse than Cloud.

  13.  

    XCloud, all they are doing is offering you some advice about situations like this to help you in the future. Make a smaller raise pre-flop and you'll be fine.

    That being said, Cloud is not the one at fault here. While he may be bluffing, there is absolutely no reason his opponent should be in the hand at any point. A-Q has nothing but a backdoor straight draw on the flop, and an inside straight draw on the turn. Yes, his A would have been good, but he still has no business being in this hand. I don't see a problem with the way Cloud played this hand, unless he had seen this guy play extremely loose and bad. It is harder to bluff at the $2 level because there are so many loose players here. So just take it easy on the bluffing, and pick better spots. But, by no means did Cloud play the worst on this hand, IMO.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPokerAA
    • CommentTimeNov 1st 2007
     

    But he knew he had you beat.. (doesn't matter how good his hand is, just how much worse yours is in this hand) (the weak way you played your hand should probably tell him that he has you beat which it seems like he realized it)

    You bet 250..5x bb pre-flop, then only bet 200 on flop and only 400 on turn. Then on the river when the guy has a really good made hand, you then decide to bet all in.. that total 600 more could've helped on your flop and turn decisions instead of pushing it in when you become way behind and impossible to bluff.

    Or you could've slowed down and not tried to bluff on every street...

    One of these would've been MUCH better than playing a weak, terrible bluff the way you did. Donk.

    •  
      CommentAuthorXCloud
    • CommentTimeNov 1st 2007
     

    Actually, I've been trying to make my game a lot more aggressive after becoming a serious rock, due to a long series of bad, highly improbable beats and being bullied around at the table. Trying to develop into a passive/aggressive player. Anyone have any suggestions or resources for aggressive betting and betting strategy?

    •  
      CommentAuthorwarman24
    • CommentTimeNov 1st 2007
     

    There's not a lot of players at the $2 sit n gos that are going to notice or really care about your table image. The best way to win at that limit is to play tight and wait for hands in the beginning and when the blinds get high try to pick up blinds when you're in position. The hand you posted is an example that if you flop a big hand, there are plenty of players in that game that are going to pay you off with ace high.

    •  
      CommentAuthorpokeropie
    • CommentTimeNov 1st 2007
     

    who the donk?